Showing posts with label Worst. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Worst. Show all posts

Sunday, 9 January 2011

Nicolas Cage Movies: His 10 Best and Worst


In honor of Nicolas Cage week, we've been sifting through the man's prepostorously long filmography in order to determine the ten best and worst films he's appeared in. This is no simple task. The highs are some of the better movies of the past few decades, and the lows are -- well, they're pretty low. As the man turns 47 years old today, we can only hope that the next four-plus decades are filled with an array of his movies as wildly uneven as the first.

When compiling the list, we tried to focus mostly on the Cage's more noteworthy performances -- so, even though it was awesome in its own right, his cameo in 'Fast Times At Ridgmont High' doesn't qualify for a spot on the "best" list. We also limited it to movies we'd actually seen, meaning that 'Season of The Witch,' which opens today, also doesn't count. (Cage told us this week that the script was "marvelous," so who knows?) Nonetheless, if you disagree with some of our picks, let us know in the comments.

THE BEST:

10. 'Valley Girl'
The movie that launched Cage's career, 'Valley Girl' is responsible for the past 28 years of Nicolas Cage glory. His first time on screen, he gets described as a "hunk," which set the stage for Cage's early career. Regardless, his turn as the L.A. punk rocker who falls for the well-heeled, titular Valley Girl was a worthy beginning.


9. 'The Weather Man'
If all you knew about this 2005 film was that it was directed by 'Pirates Of The Caribbean' maestro Gore Verbinski, starred Nicolas Cage as a character who carried around a bow and arrow, and was called 'The Weather Man,' you would be forgiven for assuming that it was about an evil, weather-controlling wizard brought down by a warrior played by Cage (with Michael Caine as his mentor, obviously). Instead, it's a quirky, indie-style dramedy in which Cage stars as a TV weatherman with a troubled, but charming, family life, whose interest in archery is mostly inspired by an interest in keeping people from throwing milkshakes on him as he walks down the street. We kind of prefer it the way that it is.

8. 'Moonstruck'
Cage's first time receiving awards consideration (he was nominated for a Golden Globe for Best Actor) saw him successfully pull off a fairly ridiculous accent and believably appear to be attracted to Cher. The movie was also one of the first major hits of Cage's career, helping elevate him to the level of stardom he'd eventually achieve.
7. 'The Rock'
Part of the tension of Cage's career has been his interest in both artsy, challenging fare and high-profile popcorn pictures. That became immediately pronounced when he followed up his Oscar-winning turn in 'Leaving Las Vegas' with a starring role in Michael Bay's follow-up to 'Bad Boys.' But while some of Cage's more commercial choices have been on the schlocky side, 'The Rock' is a pretty genuinely great example of mid-90's action filmmaking. He holds his own with Sean Connery here -- even if he's not as insanely ripped in this movie as he is in 'Con Air,' the Jerry Bruckheimer production that he starred in immediately after this one.

6. 'Honeymoon In Vegas'
Surprisingly, the first time Nicolas Cage and Bruno Mars appeared in the same film wasn't in the fevered imaginations of people who'd spent too much time reading Popeater -- it was in this well-beloved early-90's romantic comedy, where Cage starred opposite Sarah Jessica Parker. (An adorable, 6-year old Mars had a cameo as "Young Elvis.") The movie's at least half as famous for its ending -- which featured a gaggle of skydiving Elvis impersonators -- as it is for Cage's performance, but the highest praise he may receive in his career is that he is worthy of appearing in the same film as the epic contingent of skydiving Elvises. (If that's not enough, he also nabbed another Golden Globe nomination.)
5. 'Wild At Heart'
The second entry in the trio of Las Vegas-themed Nicolas Cage movies, 'Wild At Heart' is another strong performance that reveals an important facet of Cage's appeal -- visionary directors want to work with him. This time out, he worked with the divisive David Lynch on a film that at least half of our readers would probably place on the "worst" list. We've got it here, though, because of Cage's deeply affected performance that delivers exactly what the director asked of him.
4. 'Face/Off'
One thing Cage hasn't been renowned for throughout his career is subtlety. However, that's because, in most movies, he's not playing the same character (two of the same characters, actually) as John Travolta. Thrown into sharp relief by the comparison to the hammiest living movie star (in one of his hammiest roles, no less), Cage shines in 'Face/Off' as both Castor Troy and Sean Archer, turning in his finest performance in an action movie.

3. 'Leaving Las Vegas'
The role that got Cage his first win at the Golden Globes, also brought him an Oscar. It's also depressing as all hell, thanks in large part to the humanity Cage brings to the character of the pathetic alcoholic on a mission to drink himself to death.

2. 'Adaptation'
We've already highlighted the twitchy, neurotic performance that Cage gives in this Spike Jonze/Charlie Kaufman picture once this week, in which he plays screenwriter Kaufman and his fictional brother. There's more to say about it, but instead let's focus on his hair in this one, which is possibly the most compelling hairdo Cage ever sported on screen. The movie is outstanding, and it's a Cage performance without peer, but it's been gushed over so many times that we're left staring at his hair and thinking -- "Brilliant."
1. 'Raising Arizona'
There are an endless number of things to admire about Cage's signature role in this collaboration with the Coen Brothers, but even if the only truly great thing about it were the scene where he steals the diapers, it'd probably warrant the number one spot. Cage is rarely utilized as a physical comedian, but in 'Raising Arizona,' he delivers on that level, as well as on every other level he attempts -- and in this weirdly ambitious comedy, that ranges from charming nice-guy goofiness to some real emotional moments.
THE WORST:

10. 'Trapped In Paradise'
It's a very particular kind of bad performance when an actor is co-starring in a movie alongside Jon Lovitz and Dana Carvey, and he gives the least believable and naturalistic performance, but maybe the opportunity to play it that way is what attracted Cage to his role in the mid-90's Christmas caper flick 'Trapped In Paradise?'

9. 'Bangkok Dangerous'
Moviegoers leaving the theater after watching 'Bangkok Dangerous' were not being unreasonable if they questioned whether or not Nicolas Cage ever learned how to read, or if he selected his projects by playing Jenga with his script stacks and choosing the first one to topple. Other valid questions involved a Wesley Snipes-level of possible back taxes or reams of blackmail-level photos. Our explanation? He took the part because he was so stoked about the haircut he'd be wearing in the film. Nothing else makes any more sense.

8. 'Amos & Andrew'
When a comedy intended to take on race relations, starring Nicolas Cage and Samuel L. Jackson is released with the title 'Amos & Andrew,' one thing is fairly likely: at some point in the picture, Nic Cage is going to be in blackface. The movie isn't exactly offensive, but it's certainly misguided, and Cage's performance as the bungling white trash burglar Amos isn't a high point. On the bright side, the Sir Mix-A-Lot song from the soundtrack does recount the movie's entire plot, so if you're curious about it now, you can just listen to him rap "Suburbian Nightmare" instead of queuing up the whole movie on Netflix.
7. 'Windtalkers'
Sometimes Hollywood math doesn't work like real math. The equation "John Woo + Nicolas Cage - John Travolta + Christian Slater x World War II" should end "= AWESOME." Instead, it equals heavy-handed, cliched schlock that doesn't even come close to Woo and Cage's first collaboration, despite being Travolta-free. Check out Cage's death sequence for proof. (Spoiler: Cage's character dies.)
6. 'Knowing'
Director Alex Proyas made three deeply compelling science fiction movies -- 'The Crow,' 'Dark City,' and 'I, Robot,' -- before apparently getting hooked on 'Lost' and recruiting Nicolas Cage to make this pile of nonsense. Sadly, 'Knowing' came out alongside two of Cage's more underrated recent works, 'Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call New Orleans' and 'Kick-Ass,' but in lieu of the sort of compelling performance he gave in those movies, he instead just shouts mystical mumbo-jumbo a bunch.
5. 'Ghost Rider'
Ultimately, there are two kinds of movies based on Marvel Comics: Ones that are faithful to the source material and compelling in their own right, and ones that have Mark Steven Johnson's name on them. 'Ghost Rider' is of the latter variety, but Cage -- who famously toiled for years to get a crack at the role of Superman -- was so desperate to play a superhero that he took the part anyway. With cringeworthy lines ("I feel like my skull's on fire, but I'm good!") peppering the script, Cage's performance as Johnny Blaze, the titular hero's alter-ego, only rises above "wooden" to reach "cringeworthy."

4. 'Snake Eyes'
Following 'Face/Off,' Cage began a 5-year tear of mediocre-to-bad movies that he wouldn't break until finally reminding people why they used to like him with 'Adaptation.' 'Snake Eyes' was the start of that, and the only clearly memorable thing about the movie is Cage's absurdly loud shirt for the first half, which he seemed determine to render muted by overacting so egregiously that you can't pay attention to anything other than his big stupid face.


3. 'City of Angels'
After earning $200 million worldwide in its initial release, launching the Goo Goo Dolls into stratospheric (albeit short-lived) success based on the strength of the song "Iris" from the movie's 5x platinum soundtrack, and replacing the passion of Wim Wenders' 'Wings Of Desire' with a treakly mushiness in this remake, Cage would go on to never ever star as a leading man in a romance ever again ever. That's about the only thing it has going for it.

2. 'National Treasure: Book Of Secrets'
The first 'National Treasure' is a surprising, family-friendly gem of a Disney adventure movie, with Cage getting his Indiana Jones on alongside Harvey Keitel and Jon Voigt. Its sequel, by comparison, is a disappointing mess. The reason this one is ranked so high is that, while there was no reason to ever suspect 'Ghost Rider' or 'Amos & Andrew' might be good, 'National Treasure: Book Of Secrets' had everything going for it. Except for Cage's performance, its incoherent script, and the nonsensical plot. Stay tuned for the inevitable sequel in 2011!

1. 'The Wicker Man'
If you've been paying attention to Internet memes for the past few years, then you're almost certainly familiar with the so-bad-it's-hilarious "How'd it get burned??!?" clip from this 2006 Neil LaBute thriller. What you may not be aware of is that Cage's performance in that scene is actually about as good as he got in this unspeakable mess. 'The Wicker Man' is a strong contender for the worst movie out of all the movies Cage -- or anyone else -- ever made, and his performance is a very big part of why that is. Even John Travolta, while watching this in the theater, was probably thinking to himself, "Dude, turn it down a notch, okay?"

And check out our week of Nicolas Cage coverage:

Monday -- 47 Facts About Nicolas Cage
Tuesday -- In Defense of Nicolas Cage
Wednesday -- Nicolas Cage Q+A
Thursday -- The Evolution of Nicolas Cage & 'Season of the Witch' X-box Kinect Giveaway
Friday -- 10 Best and 10 Worst Nicolas Cage Movies


View the original article here

Was 2010 the Worst Year for Movies Ever?


Throughout the year, it seemed, moviegoers were offered little besides mediocre sequels and reboots, uninspired star vehicles, romance-free romantic comedies and jetsam from the 1980s pop culture landfill resurrected like brain-eating zombies. Ah, but we got to see so much of it in 3-D, and we only had to pay another 3 bucks or so for the privilege.

Hollywood studios, terrified of risk, stuck largely to formula this year, hoping the new wrinkle of rental spex would be enough to rescue the movie industry from unprofitability/irrelevance/Facebook/vague-threat-of-your-choice. But something weird happened on the way to the box office: the formulas failed to work. People stayed away from many of the movies that were supposed to be surefire hits and made hits out of movies that didn't fit the usual mold.

As going out to the movie theater became an increasingly costly and irksome experience, audiences demanded value. That may have frightened some in the executive suites, but if there's anything good that came out of this year's movie chaos, it may be the realization that the old ways of doing business will have to change, and that such change, if handled right, could prove an opportunity instead of a disaster.

It's not as if Hollywood didn't make money this year. It did -- more than $10 billion from domestic ticket sales. 2010 was the first year that boasted two billion-dollar movies (in worldwide sales), 'Toy Story 3' and 'Alice in Wonderland.' (And you could also count December 2009's 'Avatar,' which made much of its planet-wide haul in 2010.) As of Dec. 19, the domestic box office was 1.6 percent ahead of where it was at the same date last year.

But there were some grim signs amid the grosses. Average ticket prices went up to $7.95 from $7.50 a year ago. So when the year ends next week, it's likely that fewer tickets will be sold in 2010 than in 2009. In North America, moviegoers would have to buy about 67 million more tickets by the end of the year to tie 2009's gross of $10.6 billion, and even then, the number of tickets sold would be about 80 million shy of the 1.4 billion tickets sold last year.

Despite a strong start this year (largely attributable to 'Avatar' and 'Alice'), it was apparent by early summer that audiences were voting no with their feet. For the rest of the year, it was unclear whether any film (even 'Toy Story 3,' which sold $415 million worth of tickets at home and currently ranks No. 9 on the all-time box office list) would bring moviegoers back into the theaters in numbers like last year's.

What kept them away? Maybe it was trends like these:

Retreads. Or "reboots," as the studios and the entertainment press like to call them, as if there was something original and fresh about remaking 'A Nightmare on Elm Street' with a new actor as Freddy and pretending that all the previous 'Nightmare's' never happened. Sometimes, the strategy worked ('The Karate Kid,' 'TRON: Legacy'), but most of this year's reboots, remakes and sequels seemed uninspired and stale. 'Shrek Forever After,' 'Saw 3-D,' and 'Nightmare' were among the movies that proved you can go back to the well only so many times. And just because a title was familiar didn't mean a sequel was merited. Was anyone actually clamoring for another helping of 'Cats & Dogs,' or a return 23 years later to 'Wall Street'? Did anyone really want a big-screen version of 'MacGyver' or 'Marmaduke' or 'Yogi Bear'? Or yet another gloss on 'The Wolfman' or 'Robin Hood'? Apparently not.

Warmed-over '80s nostalgia. Either the people making movies (or greenlighting them) nowadays are children of the John Hughes era who have grown up and assumed positions of power, or else studios are so desperate for familiar titles that they'll remake anything that people remember from 30 years ago. 'Nightmare,' 'Karate Kid' and 'Predator' might have been obvious candidates for updates; less so 'Clash of the Titans,' 'The A-Team,' 'TRON' and 'Wall Street.' (And don't forget the inherent '80s nostalgia, however tongue in cheek, underlying such 2010 movies as 'The Expendables,' 'Hot Tub Time Machine,' 'MacGruber,' 'Cop Out,' and even retro Cold War thriller 'Salt.') Some of these movies worked, some didn't, and some (notably, 'Karate Kid') seemed to alienate fans of the original while pleasing a new generation with no memory of or emotional investment in the earlier version. In any case, the trend is only going to continue in 2011 and 2012, with new renditions of 'Arthur,' 'Conan,' 'Firestarter,' 'Red Dawn,' 'Footloose,' '21 Jump Street' and 'The Thing' (a remake of a 30-year-old movie that was itself a remake of a 30-year-old movie). Watch your back, Ferris, they're probably coming for you next.

Stalled star vehicles. It used to be a truism (at least among those who signed A-listers' $20 million paychecks) that it was big names that drew ticketbuyers on opening weekend. Yet several once-bankable names saw their movies fizzle this year. Russell Crowe failed to entice viewers to see 'Robin Hood' or 'The Next Three Days.' Jennifer Aniston failed to draw crowds to 'The Bounty Hunter' or 'The Switch.' Cher tried a comeback with 'Burlesque,' Jennifer Lopez tried one with 'The Back-Up Plan' and Mel Gibson tried one with 'Edge of Darkness,' but audiences were less than enthusiastic. Robert Pattinson's 'Remember Me' and Kristen Stewart's 'The Runaways' cast doubt on their ability to sell tickets to movies that don't have the word 'Twilight' in the title. Even combined star power -- Tom Cruise and Cameron Diaz in 'Knight and Day,' Katherine Heigl and Ashton Kutcher in 'Killers,' Johnny Depp and Angelina Jolie in 'The Tourist' and the ensemble of Reese Witherspoon, Owen Wilson, Paul Rudd and Jack Nicholson in 'How Do You Know' -- wasn't a big enough sell. Of course, the other things all these movies had in common were weak scripts and poor execution. Depp may have been golden in 'Alice' and Jolie in 'Salt,' but not even their combined prettiness could lure viewers to a vehicle as empty as 'The Tourist.'

Failed new franchises. One thing that was actually supposed to make stars obsolete was franchise movies, films dependent on familiarity with the premise and characters, rather than on who happened to be playing them. (It's why Marvel feels it can reboot 'Spider-Man' even though the Tobey Maguire movies are still fresh in everyone's memory.) But again, audiences refused to take the bait for such would-be franchise launchers as 'The Last Airbender,' 'Percy Jackson and the Olympians: The Lightning Thief,' 'The A-Team,' 'Legend of the Guardians: The Owls of Ga'Hoole,' 'Jonah Hex,' 'Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time' and 'The Sorcerer's Apprentice.' That these last two were expensive duds from the production house of Jerry Bruckheimer, the franchise-creating expert who had turned a theme park ride in to Disney's huge 'Pirates of the Caribbean' films, suggested that the old franchise formulas have run their course.

3-D. In the wake of 'Avatar,' 2010 saw about 24 new 3-D movies, more than ever before. About a third of them were shot in 2-D but hastily and shoddily retrofitted into 3-D. Almost every animated feature that came out this year was in 3-D. Those films that already boasted carefully crafted storytelling and visuals ('Toy Story 3,' 'How to Train Your Dragon,' 'Despicable Me,' 'Megamind,' 'Tangled') thrived. Others at least made original, unique use of the new palette ('Step Up 3-D,' 'Jackass 3-D'). In others, the cynicism and crassness behind the gimmickry was apparent ('Cats & Dogs: The Revenge of Kitty Galore,' 'Piranha 3-D.') In any case, with an average of two 3-D movies opening each month, most of them family-oriented, the market was quickly oversaturated. Add to that the fact that there still aren't that many 3-D screens, and they're expensive for theater owners to convert, and you began to see a bitter competition for scarce real estate. Still, Hollywood was convinced that the $3 glasses-rental surcharge was going to save the business; moviegoers were less convinced that they were always getting extra spectacle that merited paying for the extra spectacles. So far, however, the novelty hasn't worn off, so in 2011, we'll see at least 32 3-D movies.

So what did audiences like in 2010? Well they did like the formula movies -- the star vehicles, the summer action blockbusters, the 3-D toons, the sequels and retreads -- if they were done well. They liked the formula movies if they were done in ways that broke the formula conventions. (Exhibit A: 'Inception.')

The bottom has largely fallen out of the independent and foreign-language film markets in recent years, yet there were signs of life there, too, with the modest successes of such indies (or quasi-indies) as 'The Kids Are All Right,' Tyler Perry's 'Why Did I Get Married Too?' 'Black Swan,' 'The Fighter,' 'The King's Speech,' 'Cyrus' and 'City Island.' Foreign films that made a splash included 'The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo' and its two sequels, 'The Secret in Their Eyes,' 'I Am Love' and 'A Prophet.' It was a good year for documentaries, including 'Oceans,' 'Babies,' 'Waiting for Superman,' 'Exit Through the Gift Shop,' 'Inside Job,' 'Joan Rivers: A Piece of Work,' 'Restrepo' and 'The Tillman Story.' 'Black Swan' Exclusive Clip

The kind of mid-budget dramatic and comedic fare that the studios had long since abandoned to the indies (so that they could focus either on expensive blockbusters that they had developed smooth-running machinery to market or cheap horror films that marketed themselves) began to make a comeback at the studios. Somewhere in the middle, at budgets of around $40 million, movies like 'The Social Network' and 'The Town' were attracting audiences, critical acclaim and awards buzz. Other medium-budgeted studio movies that did well: 'Dear John' (budget: $25 million), 'Easy A' ($8 million), 'Secretariat' ($35 million), 'Takers' ($32 million), 'She's Out of My League' ($20 million), 'Love and Other Drugs' ($30 million), 'Nanny McPhee Returns' ($35 million), 'Kick-Ass' ($30 million), 'Predators' ($40 million), 'Ramona and Beezus' ($15 million) and most incredibly, alien-invasion thriller 'Skyline,' made for just $10 million but looking like 10 times as much.

It's possible that new technology will do for Hollywood what reliance on familiar stars and familiar plots and titles can't. Digital advances will make effects filmmaking on the cheap a la 'Skyline' more common, while the 'Jackass' boys, of all people, have proved that 3-D can be put affordably in the hands of any filmmaker and can be used in innovative ways without having to invent an expensive planet of blue aliens. And screenwriters like 'Inception's' Christopher Nolan and 'Social Network's' Aaron Sorkin have proved that mass audiences are smart enough to follow complicated, time-jumping narratives that are told from multiple perspectives and that don't rely on familiar characters. In short, it is possible for Hollywood to make a profit without spending a fortune on spectacle or stars or relying on the tired formulas that audiences snubbed in 2010. But it will take courage on the part of the studios to break free of old, no longer effective ways of making movies. It will also take courage on the part of moviegoers to seek out offbeat filmmakers and rule-breaking movies instead of staying home or rewarding business as usual.

*Follow Gary Susman on Twitter @garysusman.


View the original article here

Worst Movies of 2010: The 15 That Hurt the Most

It goes without saying that we love movies. You don't work for places called "Moviefone" and "Cinematical" if you're not willing to chance a bad film every time you hit the cinema. So while we're loyal (and sometimes even charitable) moviegoers ... we're not fools. And we know a cinematic stinkpile when we see it. So with much chagrin and a small amount of snark, we put our movie minds together and came up with the worst of the worst.

In other words, lots of movies are good. Here are 15 of the other kind:

15.'Cop Out' -- "A comedy disaster like this one is far less fun than a drama -- like Willis' own 'Color of Night' -- or a sci-fi turkey like 'Battlefield Earth.' A disaster drama can be funny, but a disaster comedy is not." -- Jeffrey M. Anderson (full review) -- Rotten Tomatoes Score: 29 positive / 125 negative = 19% -- Domestic Box Office: $44.8 million

14. 'The Wolfman' --"Despite all that production mess, 'The Wolfman' will either be seen as a squandered opportunity to pay homage to the golden years of Hollywood horror or a kick-in-the-pants bit of stupid, noisy fun. Both are true." --- John Gholson (full review) -- Rotten Tomatoes Score: 66 positive / 133 negative = 33% -- Domestic Box Office: $61.9 million

13. 'Leap Year' -- "The fact that (Amy) Adams, through the sheer force of her feisty screen presence, almost makes this debacle tolerable is a testament to her talent. More resonant, however, is the disappointing realization that she agreed to make such an unfunny, dunderheaded comedy in the first place." -- Eric D. Snider (full review) -- Rotten Tomatoes Score: 25 positive / 94 negative = 21% -- Domestic Box Office: $25.9 million

12. 'Yogi Bear' -- "Prevents Anna Faris from being funny, which I wouldn't have thought was possible. In a way, though, the film is faithful to the old cartoons, in that it's grating and tiresome and not suitable for anyone over the age of 4. The animation is better, though." -- Eric D. Snider (full review) -- Rotten Tomatoes Score: 8 positive / 49 negative = 14% -- Domestic Box Office: $21.7 million(+)

11. 'The Back-Up Plan' -- "Yes, you will get to see (Jennifer) Lopez eat chili with her bare hands, but that's only half as disgusting as a close-up on a pregnancy test sinking into a pile of fresh dog vomit. A scene in which Robert Klein, playing Zoe's OB-GYN, shows off his blood-covered hands while repeating, 'Vagina! Vagina! Vagina!' won't have Judd Apatow losing any sleep." -- John Gholson (full review) -- Rotten Tomatoes Score: 26 positive / 104 negative = 20% -- Domestic Box Office: $37.4 million

10. 'Legion' -- "The only people who can gain anything from it are the unscrupulous cinematic scroungers who have the time and the (lack of) will to watch whatever trash comes their way. Even if you think you normally fall into that category (I know I often do), skip this one. There are no hidden junkyard treasures here; just junk." -- Peter Hall (full review) -- Rotten Tomatoes Score: 17 positive / 77 negative = 18% -- Domestic Box Office: $40.1 million

9. 'When in Rome' -- "Beth and Nick are supposed to have some sort of believable attraction, but it's impossible to build one if most of the movie is spent trying to duck a shirtless Dax Shepard. When they do try and get to know each other, it's through wooden monologues about magic and family and other supposedly character-developing details that just add to the jumble." -- Jenni Miller (full review) -- Rotten Tomatoes Score: 16 positive / 86 negative = 16% -- Domestic Box Office: $32.6 million

8. 'Grown Ups' -- "This is usually the place in a review where one writes, 'but at least the actors all looked like they had fun making it,' except in this case they really don't. Everyone in 'Grown Ups' looks like they showed up, hit their marks, said their lines, and collected a paycheck. There's no real joy here, just a product churned out to sell tickets, and one that's destined to be forgotten in a few months by anyone who bothers to see it." -- Dawn Taylor (full review) -- Rotten Tomatoes Score: 15 positive / 139 negative = 10% -- Domestic Box Office: $162 million (not a typo)

7. 'Valentine's Day' -- "Stay home and rent 'Love Actually,' or better yet, spend quality time with a loved one. I guarantee you'll learn more about relationships with a companion than you will by watching this movie, and best of all you'll have an enjoyable experience that doesn't require you to temper your enthusiasm before it even starts." -- Todd Gilchrist (full review) -- Rotten Tomatoes Score: 30 positive / 143 negative = 17% -- Domestic Box Office: $110.4 million

6. 'Clash of the Titans' -- "Does the new 'Titans' have a slightly bland lead actor? Yup. Does it have pacing issues in Act I and a small sense of confusion when it comes to keeping the peripheral characters involved? Indeed it does on both counts. Is the dialogue often pulpy and are the characters frequently a bit goofy? (Especially the Greek God characters?) Yes, yep, and absolutely on all counts." -- Scott Weinberg (full review) -- Rotten Tomatoes Score: 65 positive / 167 negative = 28% -- Domestic Box Office: $163.2 million

5.'A Nightmare on Elm Street' -- "The nightmares are where (Samuel) Bayer would be expected to step up and assert his own vision. After all, this is the man who has made hundreds of stylish music videos and commercials, so he should know a thing or two about snappy visuals. The nightmares are ... er, fine." -- Peter Martin (full review) -- Rotten Tomatoes Score: 20 positive / 136 negative = 13% -- Domestic Box Office: $63 million

4. 'The Bounty Hunter' -- "Unfortunately, (Jennifer) Aniston and (Gerard) Butler stay firmly in their prescribed roles-- burly, slightly dim-witted man versus smart, exasperated woman -- until the last third of the movie, when the ice begins to break between their two characters and they try, in a shallow, rom-com sorta way, to figure out what went wrong in their marriage." -- Jenni Miller (full review) -- Rotten Tomatoes Score: 9 positive / 114 negative = 7% -- Domestic Box Office: $67 million

3. 'Sex and the City 2' -- "Besides clocking in at a bloated 146 minutes, 'Sex and the City 2' is more about the opulence of their vacation and their wardrobes than the dialogue between women that won the HBO show so many loyal viewers." -- Jenni Miller (full review) -- Rotten Tomatoes Score: 30 positive / 162 negative = 16% -- Domestic Box Office: $95.3 million

2. 'The Last Airbender' -- "(M. Night) Shyamalan's oppressive, self-serious direction help(s) to create a summertime adventure that's frigid and unenjoyable, almost on purpose." -- Todd Gilchrist (full review) -- Rotten Tomatoes Score: 10 positive / 155 negative = 6% -- Domestic Box Office: $131.6 million(!)

1. 'Jonah Hex' -- "A jumbled mess of poorly-assembled images; you can't tell who's doing what to whom, it's just sound and fury, gunshots and explosions, accompanied by the heavy metal guitar-heavy power-chording of the musical score by Marco Beltrami and Mastodon, and then it's over and someone is running away and bodies are everywhere." -- Peter Martin (full review) -- Rotten Tomatoes Score: 19 positive / 123 negative = 13% -- Domestic Box Office: $10.5 million

(Special thanks to Rotten Tomatoes and Box Office Mojo for making this painful assignment a whole lot easier.)


View the original article here